Google+ Badge

Tuesday, May 21, 2013

Second thoughts on LinkedIn Endorsements


Further to my post of 4 January 2013 http://vicg8hr.blogspot.ca/2013/01/on-thorny-dilemma-of-linkedin-skill.html, my sole reason for seriously rethinking the viability of LinkedIn Endorsements at this stage of the game comes from career coach Carol Ross, who points out that their special utility lies in enabling you to conduct your own market research about  your personal brand . 

From her astute observation it also follows that:
  • The skills and expertise you list on your profile should not necessarily reflect the things you’re competent at but rather the things you want to do more of.
  • You should not accept or hide endorsements that aren’t for skills and expertise you are interested in developing in your next job.
  • If people aren’t endorsing you for the skills and expertise you want to be known for, you need to do a better job of promoting these abilities via work interactions and social media.
  • You should consider tweaking your profile so your favourite, most endorsed skills appear prominently in wording that resonates with your target audience. 

Ms. Ross also notes three further positive applications worth trying:
  1. Using endorsements as a basis for rekindling former relationships or improving current ones by giving you a pretext to communicate with contacts after the fact.
  2. Being prompted by endorsements to request or provide more helpful, meaningful personalized recommendations instead.
  3. Capitalizing on LinkedIn’s referrals to discussion groups, job openings, and employers in your field of interest, as well as top professionals, whose skill sets can help you adjust your own profile to be more competitive.  http://www.linkedin.com/skills/
All these positives have given me sufficient inducement to start dabbling cautiously with making endorsements--but only in selected cases where I feel qualified by first-hand experience to do so—although I’m encountering all the same reservations as many of the system’s other critics; e.g.:
  • It encourages people to give endorsements too freely without cause.
  • It imposes auto-generated skills on users who don’t add them themselves.
  • It only proposes a limited number of your connections for you to endorse at the expense of other members of your network.
  • It encourages you to endorse multiple skills at once, but not necessarily the ones you want to endorse.

Even Web recruiter Tony Restell, whose cynicism is based on the belief that LinkedIn has designed its endorsement system in an incompetent and self-serving way, admits it has the potential to impact your professional life and job search quite extensively.  For him, the problem largely boils down to the fact that it’s so easy for LinkedIn members to attract a disproportionate number of endorsements from their network using the following measures.  (But those who think it’s fun to accumulate as many of these notches in their belts as possible might consider trying any of these tactics that they’ve previously overlooked):  

 Seven ways to attract more LinkedIn Recommendations 
  1. Move your Skills & Expertise section closer to the top of your profile where it’s more visible.
  2. Endorse others whenever you can.
  3. List skills that are not too specialized and easy for others to endorse.
  4. Before you start to accumulate endorsements, list skills in descending order of importance to you.  (The system will subsequently list your skills with the most endorsements first, followed by skills without endorsements in the order in which you added them.)
  5. Suggest skills your connections ought to be endorsed for that aren’t currently on their profile.
  6. Promote your goodwill and visibility (and consequently drive more traffic to your profile) by:  becoming more active and helpful in LinkedIn groups, optimizing your profile, and posting regular status and profile updates.
  7. Increase your number of contacts by allowing LinkedIn to search your e-mail contact list(s).
http://www.social-hire.com/career--interview-advice/1203/linkedin-endorsements-the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly

Friday, May 10, 2013

Is it sexual harassment to make employees work on sexually explicit projects that make them uncomfortable?


In a recent discussion on LinkedIn, Barbara Miller, a self-employed Special Markets Rep in the Greater Boston Area, posed the following two questions:

1.  Is it sexual harassment if an employee has to work on a printed piece that is sexually explicit, even if it's a utilitarian/non-fiction book or publication--and handling the job makes the employee uncomfortable?

2.  What should an employer do if an employee has moral issues with a piece s/he is working on (which tends to be an even greater issue if the content is heavy on graphics, but could also happen with text only)?  

Barbara thought some employers make accommodation for employees in these cases, and some find ways to avoid it.

My reply was:  Interesting points. When I was working as a recruiter, I vividly remember meeting a candidate who worked for a company that produced dvds and who attended church regularly. The fact that the company had started reproducing a lot of porn was what motivated her to look for a new job.”

We would be interested to hear related anecdotes or your analysis of these or similar situations.

Thursday, April 25, 2013

Google+, anyone?


I used to wonder whether I was operating at a disadvantage because my blogs are hosted by Blogger instead of WordPress--that is, until Google+ made it a cinch to install their buttons on my blogs much more easily than by following the normal procedure required to install various widgets. 

Now that I and my blogs are connected to Google+, I’m happy to report that I’m experiencing a number of technical improvements (for example, better search-engine ranking and practically instantaneous blog feeds to Google+.)

But here’s the down side:  it’s downright spooky to find myself rattling around Google+, where I feel relatively alone because so many of my literally thousands of social-media contacts seem to be absent.  The system has managed to help me track down and contact only a disappointingly small number of you.  If you are already a member of Google+ but I’ve been unable to locate and contact you, please reach out to me there. 

My initial thought in joining Google+ was that it would provide an interesting new frontier for social-media experiments.  But I believe the experiments would be much more enjoyable and productive if more of my existing social-media contacts would come out and play.  So please give some thought to joining me on the platform. 

These are really my ideas.  Google+ didn’t hire me to say this.

But at the same time, if I’m overlooking any good reasons for not migrating to Google+, please let me know what they are.

https://accounts.google.com/ServiceLogin?service=oz&passive=1209600&continue=https://plus.google.com/?hl%3Den%26gpsrc%3Dgplp0%26partnerid%3Dgplp0&followup=https://plus.google.com/?hl%3Den%26gpsrc%3Dgplp0%26partnerid%3Dgplp0&hl=en

Wednesday, April 3, 2013

Canadian government unveils revamped guide and Internet settlement tool for new immigrants


Yesterday Canada’s federal government unveiled “Welcome to Canada”, a revised 146-page guide for new immigrants.  
Compiled from academic research and consultation with immigration experts and new immigrants, the booklet is aimed at helping newcomers integrate and succeed in the Canadian economy and society as soon as possible.  It provides basic  practical information on such topics as Canada’s education system, justice system, laws, and labour market.  The new guide is available on line (either via download or as an e-book) and through settlement service providers (who often greet immigrants on arrival at the airport.)
Changes since the last guide (released in 2011) include descriptions of marriage fraud (marrying Canadian citizens or permanent residents only to gain entry into Canada) and human smuggling as criminal activities (against both of which crimes the federal government has recently launched crackdowns.)   Like the previous guide, the current guide also condemns such usually misogynistic practices as polygamy, spousal abuse, forced marriage, honour killings, and genital mutilation.

In addition, Minister Kenney announced the “Living in Canada Tool”, a new interactive Internet application that lets recently arrived newcomers produce a semi-customized settlement plan with tips, next steps, and links based on user responses to an initial questionnaire. Users can also locate immigrant services on a map and then supposedly bring along their settlement plan when they visit to receive additional, personalized support.

The “Living in Canada Tool” is the federal government’s second Internet immigration application.  The first was a tool for on-line assessment and application, called “Come to Canada Wizard”.

These latest initiatives have been launched under Canada’s current Conservative Immigration Minister Jason Kenney, whose other achievements have included:  eliminating a backlog of 280,000 applicants, decreasing health-care coverage for refugee claimants, freezing applications from grandparents and parents seeking to join children in Canada, cracking down on immigration consultants, tightening language requirements for newcomers, introducing harsh penalties for people who lie on immigration forms, and revamping citizenship documents to increase emphasis on Canadian culture and expectations.  Minister Kenney’s supporters credit him with changing Canada’s international status from a country with wide-open doors that asks few questions to a country that welcomes newcomers but has also raised its entry requirements and views citizenship as a privilege to be earned.
““To help newcomers integrate, the Government has tripled settlement funding since 2005-06 and remains committed to ensuring the distribution of settlement funding is fair, that immigrants receive the same level of service, regardless of where they choose to settle,”” said Minister Kenney in Citizenship and Immigration Canada’s official news release

Thursday, March 7, 2013

Global Experience Ontario Access Centre helps skilled international professionals get licensed to work in Ontario


I just found out about the Global Experience Ontario Access Centre (GEO), a department of Ontario’s provincial government that helps skilled newcomers obtain certification to work in Ontario in14 regulated professions. 

GEO’s services include:
·      Information about licensing, standards, and registration processes
·      Referrals to academic credential assessment agencies and language testing (for English and French)
·      Referral to the appropriate Ontario regulatory body for your profession
·      Links to language training programs nearest your home (in English and French)
·      On-site reference materials and resources, including “career maps” for each regulated profession and some trades
·      Information and referrals for retraining and bridge training programs
·      Information about alternative professional avenues where appropriate
·      Referrals to internships and mentoring programs
·      Computer terminals for clients’ use
·      Webinars for internationally trained individuals who have not yet moved to Canada but who wish to learn about the certification process in advance
·      Referral to relevant employment services.

The 14 regulated professions GEO handles are:
1.             Architects
2.             Certified Engineering Technicians and Technologists
3.             Certified General Accountants
4.             Certified Management Accountants
5.             Chartered Accountants
6.             Early Childhood Educators
7.             Foresters
8.             Land Surveyors
9.             Lawyers and Paralegals
10.          Professional Engineers
11.          Professional Geoscientists
12.          Social Workers and Social Service Workers
13.          Teachers
14.          Veterinarians

For more information on GEO, click on:
A comparable service for internationally educated health professionals, called HealthForceOntario, is found at:
http://www.healthforceontario.ca/en/Home
Today’s post is intended as additional constructive commentary on my posts in the recent past about Canada’s urgent need to strengthen its skilled workforce through immigration at:

Monday, February 11, 2013

Thanks for the 30-second warm glow, LinkedIn

I felt special for 30 seconds this morning, after LinkedIn sent me an e-mail that read:

Victoria, congratulations!
You have one of the top 5% most viewed LinkedIn profiles for 2012.
LinkedIn now has 200 million members. Thanks for
playing a unique part in our community!

Then I did the math and realized that 5 percent of LinkedIn’s 200 million registered users equals 10 million people—a number approximately the same size as the entire population of Sweden, Portugal, the Czech Republic, Hungary, or Tunisia.

Update on 13 February 2013:

This week it seems many LinkedIn users have posted generic notifications from LinkedIn similar to the one above. Mary Beth Smith, owner of the very active Market Your Printing Company and Girls Who Print discussion groups, even commented that she had to start deleting them to keep legitimate discussions from disappearing off the board.
http://www.linkedin.com/groupItem?view=&gid=2946757&type=member&item=212988288&qid=e6f55abb-a3ea-42a9-b4d0-fad124a3ddf3&trk=group_most_popular-0-b-cmr&goback=%2Egmp_2946757%2Egde_2946757_member_212988288%2Egmp_2946757%2Eamf_2946757_13002312%2Egmp_2946757

I have to wonder why users are proving so cooperative at playing along with LinkedIn’s self-promotion scheme.  Is it because they’re delighted by the ease of regurgitating ready-made, host-approved content, even though in enlightened social-media practice going generic is the 9th Deadly Sin?
http://www.inc.com/jeff-haden/9-mistakes-youre-making-on-linkedin.html 


It’s also worth emphasizing that, although democracy is supposedly the underlying principle behind social media, in this instance LinkedIn has imposed a self-advertising monster from on high that will clutter the platform with redundant, user-unfriendly content for days or weeks to come.
 

More gains in popularity and investment value for LinkedIn


Further to my post of 2 November 2012 http://vicg8hr.blogspot.ca/2012/11/growing-numbers-think-linkedin-is-good.html, LinkedIn has reaffirmed its status as the biggest social-media success story based on the continued escalation of its number of users, revenues, and stock-market returns for investors. 

Among the highlights of recent financial reports:

  • LinkedIn’s stock price has increased by over 230 percent from its initial public offering in May 2011.
  • Every quarter since it went public, the company has exceeded analysts’ expectations.
  • After it reported an 81 percent increase in fourth-quarter revenue on Thursday, its stock skyrocketed 21 percent of Friday to record-high levels of US$151.89 per share.
  • For the third straight quarter, LinkedIn users have increased by 8 percent, bringing the current count to just over 200 million. 
  • Although Facebook remains the largest social network with over 1 billion users, it relies mainly on revenue from advertising.  By contrast, LinkedIn depends on a healthy combination of advertising and subscription revenues from its premium products.
  • BMO Capital Markets Corp. analyst Daniel Salmon recently advised investors:  “We believe LinkedIn is replacing job boards and other sources at the go-to source to find employees—something which should propel strong growth for the foreseeable future.”
 If you haven't become a registered LinkedIn user yet, now might be a good time to take the plunge and find out what all the fuss is about.  https://www.linkedin.com/reg/join

http://mashable.com/2013/02/07/linkedin-stock-jumps-10-after-q4-revenue-tops-300-million/